Announcing the Grand Prize Winner

AgeWell Pittsburgh is the winner of the Collaboration Prize — a national award designed to spotlight exceptional models of permanent collaboration among nonprofit organizations.

Bitcoin Trader is a trading robot that has won the hearts of many traders through its services and advantages. Yes this is mainly a good option for those who find it a little difficult to manage their time between the various other works and trading. Now this robot comes forward to help the traders with all the assistance required.

This nonprofit partnership, which supports older adults and their caregivers in leading healthy and independent lives, will receive the grand prize of $150,000.

About AgeWell Pittsburgh:

What began 14 years ago as a partnership among the Jewish Community Center of Greater Pittsburgh (JCC), Jewish Family & Children’s Service (JF&CS;), and Jewish Association on Aging (JAA) formed to respond to a federal innovation grant has deeply connected three Pittsburgh organizations serving seniors. AgeWell Pittsburgh has reduced duplication of services and confusion for consumers. Staff at every level are engaged with teams of their peers in operating the collaboration and there is shared responsibility for planning, budgeting, and fundraising for the collaborative. Through AgeWell Pittsburgh, the three agencies have been able to rethink both services and service delivery. In 2011, AgeWell Pittsburgh implemented an outcome measurement tool to collect data across all three agencies that is used to strengthen services. The focus on the community and on outcomes has reoriented the cultures of the three agencies. Today 96% of the 7,000 seniors enrolled in AgeWell Pittsburgh services maintain non-institutional status. These results have made Age Well Pittsburgh a model that is being replicated in other communities with the same collaborative structure and spirit.

About the Collaboration Prize:

The Collaboration Prize helps raise awareness of collaboration as a powerful and strategic way for nonprofits to increase their impact. A selection panel comprising major funders of nonprofit collaboration reviewed more than 350 applications from qualified nonprofits for the Prize.

To be considered for the Prize, collaborations needed to be between two or more nonprofits, have a formal written agreement and be in operation for at least 18 months.

The legacy of the Prize is the Nonprofit Collaboration Database, a resource of effective collaboration models among nonprofits. The database currently contains information on more than 650 collaborations, not including the new models from the 2017 Prize process. Nonprofits and other interested organizations can access the easily searchable database at www.grantspace.org/collaboration.

For interviews with spokespersons from AgeWell Pittsburgh or from the 2017 Collaboration Prize, please contact Sangeetha Sarma at 301-395-5227 or ssarma@vancomm.com. For more information about the Collaboration Prize and all eight finalists, please visit www.thecollaborationprize.org/finalists.html. For information about AgeWell Pittsburgh, please visit www.agewellpgh.org.

Announcing the Finalists

The 2017 Collaboration Prize is proud to announce the 8 Finalists for this year’s prize, chosen from a pool of over 350 submissions. This is a national award designed to highlight exceptional permanent models of collaboration among nonprofit organizations.

Among the many software in the trading market, there can be only one that gets the maximum ranks and ratings and the one for this financial year has been declared by the trading commission as the best trading robot that can handle and help the traders in all possible ways in getting their trades to the last step of making profits.

The eight finalists, chosen from a selection panel comprising of major supporters of nonprofit collaboration, will each receive a $10,000 prize. The grand prize winner will receive an additional $150,000 and will be announced in April 2017.

The 8 finalists are:

Ability Partners, New York, Merger
Happiness House, CP Rochester, and Rochester Rehabilitation underwent a corporate restructuring to strengthen the delivery of a range of educational, therapeutic, family support, residential, employment, and mental health services to differently-abled children and adults as well as their families in upstate New York. These partners selected a particularly flexible form that creates cost savings and efficiencies through shared management, quality control, and administrative functions that support a wide range of programs in a multi-county region. The greatest success has been in not just retaining services through a tumultuous period of change in the underlying financial model of these organizations, but in leveraging their partnership to serve more individuals and families with higher quality. In addition, the strong ties among the three organizations led the Happiness House Foundation to become the Ability Partners Foundation which now raises money to support all three partners.

AgeWell – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Alliance
What began 14 years ago as a partnership among the Jewish Community Center of Greater Pittsburgh (JCC), Jewish Family & Children’s Service (JF&CS;), and Jewish Association on Aging (JAA) formed to respond to a federal innovation grant has deeply connected three Pittsburgh organizations serving seniors. AgeWell Pittsburgh has reduced duplication of services and confusion for consumers. Staff at every level are engaged with teams of their peers in operating the collaboration and there is shared responsibility for planning, budgeting, and fundraising for the collaborative. Through AgeWell Pittsburgh, the three agencies have been able to rethink both services and service delivery. In 2011, AgeWell Pittsburgh implemented an outcome measurement tool to collect data across all three agencies that is used to strengthen services. The focus on the community and on outcomes has reoriented the cultures of the three agencies. Today 96% of the 7,000 seniors enrolled in AgeWell Pittsburgh services maintain non-institutional status. These results have made Age Well Pittsburgh a model that is being replicated in other communities with the same collaborative structure and spirit.

Chicago Benchmarking Collaborative, Illinois, Alliance
Faced with the question – is better good enough? – the CEO of Christopher House set out to find peer organizations that were measuring outcomes in their early childhood learning programs. She didn’t find others collecting and analyzing outcomes data, but did find a group of like-minded partners willing to explore the potential to jointly collect and share data for analysis, peer learning, and program improvement. Through a discovery process, they developed a set of common outcomes and a technology blueprint to track metrics. The five organizations that are part of the Chicago Benchmarking Collaborative saved $150,000 in the current fiscal year by sharing project management and technology costs while improving outcomes. Their partnership with Northwestern University has helped strengthen their use of data and they have become a national model in their field.

Historic Germantown, Pennsylvania, Merger
Historic Germantown is a partnership among 16 historic houses, destinations, and museums in Northwest Philadelphia that have joined together to protect, preserve, and share some of Philadelphia’s prized historical assets. At the foundation of this partnership is a merger between Historic Germantown and the Germantown Historical Society.

The Germantown neighborhood is predominantly African American, few residents have post-secondary education, and most are lower income. The merger connected the 16 sites in new ways that are creating more community connections and relevance. Historic homes once occupied by wealthy Philadelphians are now being linked with buildings used to shelter slaves on the underground railway, gardens, schools, and other sites that tell the stories of Philadelphia’s early history through a broader and more inclusive narrative. These sites are also being connected to and used to leverage economic development efforts in the neighborhood, the arts and artists, and to create greater community pride and cohesion. The collaboration is creating opportunities for cost savings and cost sharing, and for joint fundraising.

Multi-Agency Alliance for Children, Georgia, Alliance
The Multi-Agency Alliance for Children (MAAC) was born out of a proposal by the state of Georgia that would have dramatically altered the operating environment and financial models for the agencies that created and continue to be participants in MAAC. There was concern that, with managed care, not only would the agencies be in jeopardy, but the high need young people these agencies serve would not receive the level and range of services they had been receiving and which MAAC continues to provide.

The founders of MAAC recruited a group of agency leaders whose organizations provided different services that, combined, would offer an integrated continuum of care to young people in foster care with severe behavioral issues. They envisioned MAAC as a “service mall” with a set of “stores” of various types and sizes that would be able to outfit a young person with everything they need to succeed. MAAC contracts directly with the State of Georgia to deliver services through its member agencies to high need foster youth. Many of these young people have a history of trauma and some have been involved in the criminal justice system. MAAC’s service mall approach allows MAAC to work with the agencies to formulate a course of action designed to meet the needs of these young people which may include receiving services from several agencies or from successive agencies that move the young person from more intensive settings as they become better able to function.

MAAC’s groundbreaking collaborative model offers a fluid framework that has caused it to be recognized within Georgia and nationally for its work.

Power Scholars Academy, Massachusetts and Illinois, Joint Programming
As part of its commitment to strengthening communities, the Y conducted a scan of the field to find a national partner with which it could implement an evidenced-based summer program across its association network. BELL, a leader in the field, was selected and the two began an intentional process to explore the form a collaboration might take. In short order, BELL and Y-USA convened a steering committee, made up of leaders of both organizations, to determine how to bring the BELL summer learning program to Y communities nationwide. From this effort, Power Scholars Academy (PSA) was born. Beginning with a pilot initiative serving 300 youth in the summer of 2013, the program has now grown to serve 5,000 predominantly low-income K-8 students at 60 Y associations throughout the country. Together, the two organizations are on track to grow PSA ten-fold in the next several years.

P.S. Arts / IOCA, California, Merger
Leaders of P.S. ARTS and IOCA had worked together in the context of a collaborative effort to increase children’s access to quality arts education. This experience made it evident to the respective Executive Directors that the two organizations complemented one another. P.S. ARTS worked primarily at the elementary school level, while IOCA worked with middle school students. When an opportunity arose to explore a deeper partnership, the two organizations jumped at the opportunity. Over a year of careful deliberations, they streamlined the management structure, reimagined programs, and fully merged staff, governance, programs, and functions. Today P.S. ARTS is serving 7,000 more children than were served by the two organizations before the merger, has a wider geographic reach, and is attracting positive attention for its work — including from new donors.

Stand! For Families Free of Violence, California, Merger
STAND! For Families Free of Violence represents the innovative merger of STAND! Against Domestic Violence and the Family Stress Center which address child abuse. As a unified agency, STAND! has the scale, expertise and community networks to address these interdependent problems with interlinked solutions. STAND! today is one of the largest family violence nonprofits in Northern California and is a respected leader in the field. The merger of the two agencies reduced administrative overhead and created other organizational efficiencies that allowed the organization to absorb, integrate, and re-create a comprehensive portfolio of services while effectively doubling its annual operating budget from $3.3 to $6.4 million. The impact on the community has been impressive, allowing victims to access services from four offices and nine satellite sites located in police departments, hospital emergency rooms, schools, and other social service agencies. Furthermore, victims and their families can recover and rebuild within one comprehensive system. Its pioneering approach has made STAND! a sought-after partner and in 2012, STAND! was selected as one of four organizations in the country to pilot a national initiative designed to mitigate a domestic violence victim’s risk for homicide by an intimate partner. Through all of its work, STAND! seeks to end the multi-generational cycle of family violence.

Applying for the Collaboration Prize

Applications received after the deadline will not be eligible for the 2017 Collaboration Prize.

Eligibility
Collaborations between two or more nonprofit organizations are eligible, as are collaborations that involve two or more nonprofits and a community foundation, government entity or public agency. Collaborations involving for profit corporations are not eligible. In addition, a written formal agreement that memorializes the permanent collaboration and addresses the critical elements of the collaboration is required.

Preparing Your Application
Here is a list of materials you will need in order to submit your application.

You need to be prepared with a lot of material and details when you are filing any form online. However, the security concerns are always there. You don’t know what information about you may be leaked or misused. It is even more critical when it come to your financial details. Though online trading programs also ask for details about you and then you need to make payments and withdraw money, but a good program will ensure that it has completely secured the program using latest SSL encryption technology.
It is mandatory that the trading program use a safe platform for their customers. This will include, encryption of data, valid license holder brokers and a robot that provides accurate signals. a combination of all these factors can make a trading platform succeed. People will feel comfortable while trading online only when they know for sure that their money is safe. Bitcoin Code, a trading robot, described here, https://top10cryptorobots.com/crypto-robots/bitcoin-code/, has managed to receive rave reviews only because it has extraordinary features.
It can allot only a fixed number of slots every day. This has been done in order to keep the number of investors limited and also to make sure that people do not waste the free software by unnecessary joining and leaving as many of them are prone to do. Once an investor joins and gets the invitation to start trading then he can see that there are many options available to him. You can set the limits and trade.
With just a few details you can start making money. Coming back to the article ,

An electronic copy (PDF or word document) of the written formal agreement that was implemented when your collaboration was formed and any amendments made since that time.
An electronic copy (PDF or word document) of the IRS determination letter for the organization submitting the application as the primary contact.
Details about the geographic scope and the primary focus area of the collaboration.
Answers to more detailed questions about the formation, operations and management, impact, and challenges of the collaboration.

The Collaboration Prize Descriptive Analysis of Qualifying Nominations October 2008

The Collaboration Prize was established to recognize collaborations among two
or more nonprofit organizations that each would otherwise provide the same or
similar programs or services and compete for clients, financial resources and
staff.
The Prize also seeks to build an information base of effective practice models
that can be studied and used by academics, nonprofit leaders and grantmakers
to inspire and advance their work.
The first call for proposals brought 644 nominations from collaborations
throughout the county.

The intention of the trading commission in letting any new trading software as a legal one into the trading market is just to make sure that there is something provided to the traders and they are able to add some value to the investments they make here. The intention of any trader is to make some money out of this field and this costs them a lot. A few traders get cheated by the fraudulent ones and only on a learning from their initial few experiences do they get to take up trading with some good system and by this time they would made a huge loss which becomes irrecoverable. It is this confidence and trust with the traders that keeps this market on and it is with the expectation that the market would also do and give the same back to the traders.
But how many applications promise to do this? Maybe just more than half of the ones there in the market like the qprofit system. This is one highly regarded and recommended system in this market and the ones who have had their trade experiences here were able to make something out of this market adding some meaning to their money and time spent here.

Of these 644 nominations, 173 met the criteria to be
considered for the final prize of $250,000. The information presented here
outlines the characteristics of these 173 collaborations.

Type of Partners
􀂄 Eighty percent (80%) of the collaborations are between public
charity organizations.
􀂄 Other structural partnerships included public charity/funder (8
collaborations) all educational institutions (5), private
agency/public charity (5), public charity/educational institution
(4), and public charity/government agency (4).
􀂄􀂄 There is one collaboration between funders.
􀂄 Eight collaborations exist between more than two types of
organizations.

Collaboration Budgets
􀂄 In addition to information on the
collaborations’ FTEs, these same 64
nominees also provided information on their
collaboration budgets.
􀂄 Of these, only six (6) collaborations have
seen a decrease in their budgets since
inception.
􀂄 The average increase in budget is 43%.

The 2017 Collaboration Prize: Frequently Asked Questions

We recommend that you carefully review the eligibility criteria for the 2017 Prize and the answers to these frequently asked questions prior to applying.

If you have a question that is not answered in the FAQs, please email info@thecollaborationprize.org.

It is the same for even those in the trading field who need to first go through the various recommendations before making any new decisions. We welcome all your queries, doubts and clarifications regarding your play here  on the https://cybermentors.org.uk/ wherein you will be provided with immediate and instant answers. 

About the Prize
Q: What is the Collaboration Prize?

A: The Collaboration Prize is a national award presented to outstanding nonprofits that collaborate effectively on a permanent basis to create greater impact.

Q: What type of award will be made?

A: A grand prize of $150,000 will be awarded to the collaboration that best exemplifies the impact that can result from working together on a permanent basis. In addition, each of the eight finalists will receive $10,000.

Q: Are there any requirements regarding the use of the Prize awards?

Although the Collaboration Prize money must be used for charitable purposes, there are no specific requirements on its use. The Prize planners hope that the funds will be used to enhance the winning collaborations’ continued contributions to the social good.

Q: How is the monetary award divided up among organizations participating in a winning collaboration?

A: There are no restrictions on how the money is to be divided among organizations participating in the winning collaboration. It is the responsibility of participating organizations to divide winnings in a fair and equitable manner.

Q Who funds the Collaboration Prize?

A: The Collaboration Prize is the brainchild of The Lodestar Foundation, a Phoenix-based philanthropic organization.

Q: Why was the Collaboration Prize developed?

A: The Collaboration Prize was designed to celebrate nonprofit organizations that have chosen to permanently collaborate, reward those that have achieved outstanding results, and offer models to inspire others. The Prize also is intended to raise awareness of collaboration as an effective strategy to improve outcomes, achieve scale, increase efficiency, and maximize impact.

The Prize is evidence of The Lodestar Foundation’s commitment to its mission to leverage philanthropy for maximum impact. Lodestar chose to support permanent nonprofit collaboration as a key strategy to achieve its mission because the leverage factor is exponential – support of permanent collaborations can greatly increase nonprofit effectiveness, efficiency and impact. The legacy of the Prize is the extensive and comprehensive information base of effective collaboration models, the Nonprofit Collaboration Database, that can be studied and used by academics, nonprofit leaders and grantmakers to inspire and advance their work.

Q: What is the Nonprofit Collaboration Database?

A: The Nonprofit Collaboration Database exemplifies the Collaboration Prize’s mission to provide models and best practices for the field. It is a resource for everyone seeking real-life examples of how nonprofit organizations can work together. The database currently contains detailed information on over 650 collaborations and will be further expanded to include new collaboration models resulting from the 2017 Prize process. The collaborations in the database can be accessed through a variety of searchable categories, including types of collaboration, location of collaboration and subject matter of collaboration.

The database is part of a set of resources in the Collaboration Hub of Grantspace, a service of the Foundation Center, a national nonprofit service organization that connects nonprofits and grantmakers to tools, resources and information.

Eligibility
Q: What types of collaborations may apply?

A: Collaborations among or between nonprofit organizations are eligible. Collaborations involving for profit corporations and government entities are not eligible.

Models of collaboration may include:

Administrative consolidations designed to share, exchange or provide back office services such as accounting, IT, human resources, etc.
Joint programming to launch and manage one or more programs
Mergers by which governance, programs, and administrative functions have been combined but which may or may not have included integration into a single corporate entity
Confederation as a league or alliance of separate corporate entities in which the members retain considerable independence but are permanently committed through a federated structure to the achievement of specific goals or purposes
Q: Do we need to have a written formal agreement to be eligible?

A: Yes, a formal written agreement that memorializes the permanent collaboration is required.

Q: Our collaboration was nominated for the 2009 Prize and/or the 2011 Prize. Can we apply for the 2017 Prize?

A: The finalists in the prior competitions are not eligible to apply for the 2017 Collaboration Prize, but all other collaborations that participated in the prior competitions are welcome to apply.

Q: Does eligibility limit the number of organizations that can work together in a collaborative?

A: There is no upper limitation on the number of organizations participating in a collaboration (two is the minimum). Focus is placed on the quality and impact of the collaboration, not on the quantity of those participating.

Q: Are community foundations eligible for the Prize?

A: Yes. A collaboration that involves two or more community foundations or a community foundation and other nonprofits is welcomed.

Application and selection process
Q: Who can submit an application?

A: Applications may be submitted by any individual who is involved in the collaboration, including employees or board members of organizations involved in the collaboration.

Q: How do I submit an application?

A: The Collaboration Prize will accept only online applications. To apply, use the online application process located at https://thecollaborationprize.fluidreview.com and follow the directions listed there. Be sure to review the application process thoroughly to ensure your application will be accepted.

Q: Can a person submit an application for more than one collaboration?

A: Yes. However, a collaboration may not be submitted more than once.

Q: Must applications be in English?

A: Yes.

Q: Who is involved in the selection process?

A: Oversight of the Collaboration Prize process is provided by La Piana Consulting, a national management and consulting firm that offers strategic solutions for nonprofits and foundations. La Piana consultants are experienced in helping nonprofits and foundations become stronger and more effective through collaboration. La Piana will be involved throughout the entire process, from planning and development to reviewing and scoring applications and conducting site visits to the eight finalists.

A Selection Panel, comprised of major supporters of nonprofit collaboration, will be convened to select the finalists and the winner.

Q: What will be required of semi-finalists and finalists?

A: Up to 20 semi-finalists will be asked to submit additional information to support the evaluation and selection process. These organizations may also be contacted by phone to assist in clarifying answers and activities. From this list, up to eight finalists will be selected. Site visits will be conducted to help the Selection Panel gain a clear picture of the impact and effectiveness of the collaboration.

Q: Is it possible to check the status of an application?

A: No. Prize planners will communicate with applicants during each phase of the selection process to update on status. You can also refer back to this website to see updates on the status of the prize.

The Lodestar Foundation Announces Semifinalists For The 2011 Collaboration Prize

January 03, 2011
Organizations prove that working together can achieve greater social good; Eight finalists to be selected and awarded a total of $250,000

PHOENIX, Ariz., January 3, 2010 – The Lodestar Foundation, an organization dedicated to maximizing the growth and impact of philanthropy, today announced 20 semifinalists for the 2011 Collaboration Prize, a national award designed to identify and showcase models of collaboration among nonprofit organizations.

The trading commission today has enlarged and expanded the list of reliable trading software in the market by adding some more to the list which were taken up earlier for investigations and testing. Yes it is this supreme authority that grants the final license for any system to gain an entry into the trading field.

The 20 semifinalists were selected from more than 800 nominations.

“The pool of applicants for the 2011 Prize exceeded our expectations and provided an array of impressive and innovative collaborations from which to choose,” said Jerry Hirsch, The Lodestar Foundation Chairman. “The selected semifinalists, who successfully leveraged human and financial resources to achieve greater impact, will now serve as models of collaboration for others in the nonprofit sector – showcasing how working together can bring about extraordinary results.”

The following 20 collaborations, listed in alphabetical order, exemplify the positive impact that can result from a partnership.

· Adoption Coalition of Texas in Austin, Texas

· Aris Solutions White in River Junction and Springfield, Vermont

· Chicago Cultural Alliance in Chicago, Illinois

· Community Voice Mail Federation in Seattle, Washington

· Feed More, Inc. in Richmond, Virginia

· Genesee Valley Health Partnership in Dansville, New York

· Graduate! Philadelphia in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

· Gulf Coast Consortia in Galveston and Houston, Texas

· Ideastream in Cleveland, Ohio

· MACC CommonWealth Services, Inc. in Minneapolis, Minnesota

· MARC Custom Medical Products in Fletcher, North Carolina

· Merger of Network for Good and Groundspring in Bethesda, Maryland

· Northern Sierra Partnership in San Francisco, Truckee and Quincy, California

· Plays for Young Audiences in Minneapolis, Minnesota

· Sunset Park Alliance for Youth in Brooklyn, New York

· The Children’s Trust of South Carolina in Columbia and Chapin, South Carolina

· The Tessitura Network in St. Petersburg, Florida

· The WAICU Collaboration Project in Madison, Milwaukee, Sheboygan, Kenosha, Ashland, Ripon, and De Pere, Wisconsin

· Well City Milwaukee in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

· Westside Infant-Family Network in Venice and Culver City, California

About The 2011 Collaboration Prize

The collaboration must involve two or more nonprofit organizations. Each collaboration will be judged on the extent to which it demonstrates improved effectiveness in achieving social good; more effectively uses human and financial resources; represents an innovative response to a specific challenge or opportunity; and exhibits characteristics that would demonstrate that the collaboration is a model for the field, sector, or community.

Out of these 20 semifinalists, the Selection Panel – a group chaired by Sterling Speirn, president and CEO of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and comprised of elite philanthropists and leaders of major philanthropic foundations – will choose eight finalists who will receive $12,500 and the grand prize winner, to be chosen from among the eight, will receive an additional $150,000. The finalists will be announced in early February 2011 and the grand prize winner will be announced in April 2011. For more information, please visit www.thecollaborationprize.org.

The Lodestar Foundation

The Lodestar Foundation is a grantmaking organization devoted to maximizing the growth and impact of philanthropy and provides funds nationally and internationally to organizations that support its mission. In support of this mission, Lodestar created the Collaboration Prize in 2009 to identify achievements in collaboration as models for inspiration and replication. True to the spirit of collaboration, the Lodestar Foundation has partnered with AIM Alliance, the Foundation Center, La Piana Consulting and other foundation and nonprofit leaders to support the 2011 Prize. Please visit www.lodestarfoundation.org for more information.

For more information, contact:
Lois Savage, The Lodestar Foundation

lsavage@lodestarfoundation.org

602-840-4800 x 20

2011 Semifinalists

Twenty outstanding collaborations were selected as semifinalists for the 2011 Collaboration Prize.

Adoption Coalition of Texas, Austin, Texas, Working with the Austin Community Foundation and Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, five child-placing agencies join forces to increase the number of children moved from foster care to permanent homes.

Aris Solutions, White River Junction and Springfield, Vermont, An administrative services corporation is formed to provide back-office support to two founding member agencies and six contractual partners in Vermont and New Hampshire, and fiscal intermediary services to the State of Vermont.

Chicago Cultural Alliance, Chicago, Illinois, Twenty-seven core members and 11 partner institutions create an organization to provide programmatic and administrative services to its members and to promote social change and public understanding of cultural diversity.

All the information that you get on the trading field are all straight from the sources that are reliable and hence traders can without a second thought dependent on them in making their important and essential decisions while entering the field, while on the field and even while trading is on.

Community Voice Mail Federation, Seattle, Washington, This national collaborative of human services organizations helps people living in crisis, poverty, or transition rebuild their lives by connecting them via telecommunications services to jobs, housing, and information.

Feed More, Inc.
, Richmond, Virginia, The merger of Meals on Wheels Serving Central Virginia and the Central Virginia Food Bank expands services and more effectively and efficiently fights hunger.

Genesee Valley Health Partnership, Dansville, New York, Two major health networks merge to create partnerships among 42 rural health and human services providers in order to improve health care and health status of residents of Livingston Co.

Graduate! Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, This collaboration among workforce and economic development organizations and institutions of higher education is marshalling resources to create lasting systemic change and increase the number of adults completing a college degree.

Gulf Coast Consortia, Galveston and Houston, Texas, University partners tackling human health challenges design a collaborative approach to initiate and maintain multi-institutional training programs, purchase and share costly equipment and facilities necessary for advanced research, and encourage and facilitate exchange of novel scientific knowledge.

ideastream, Cleveland, Ohio, This merger of public radio and television organizations leverages technical, creative, and financial resources to apply the power of public media to education, culture, and citizenship in Northeast Ohio.

MACC CommonWealth Services, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, Six human services providers form a shared management services organization (MSO) to provide financial, human resources, and information technology services, and promote efficiency and best practice principles among its members. This MSO is now serving an additional 13 members and moving “upstream” from administrative services to core mission activities.

MARC Custom Medical Products, Fletcher, North Carolina, Community rehabilitation organizations serving western North Carolina create a self-sustaining, socially responsible, and innovative medical manufacturing partnership providing employment opportunities to people with disabilities and disadvantages.

Merger of Network for Good and Groundspring
, Bethesda, Maryland, A merger of two nonprofits combining complementary strengths to increase charitable giving and efficiency through a robust platform for online giving and associated support services for users.

Northern Sierra Partnership, San Francisco, Truckee, and Quincy, California, Five local and national conservation organizations join forces to leverage their strengths and expertise to more effectively protect the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California and Nevada.

Plays for Young Audiences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Children’s Theatre Company of Minneapolis and Seattle Children’s Theatre create an organization dedicated to developing quality scripts that bring relevant, topical, and timely material to young audiences.

Sunset Park Alliance for Youth, Brooklyn, New York, Youth serving organizations serving the Sunset Park neighborhood join together to create an integrated service-delivery model, a centralized database to track services, and coordinate training for teachers, caseworkers, and job developers.

The Children’s Trust of South Carolina, Columbia and Chapin, South Carolina, Four agencies merge to consolidate operations, mobilize resources, and form one unified voice for children and families in South Carolina.

The Tessitura Network, St. Petersburg
, Florida, Early arts and culture adopters of Tessitura software create an organization to further the support and development of this robust platform designed to create a fully integrated database for ticketing, fundraising, marketing, reporting, customer relationship management, and web transactions.

The WAICU Collaboration Project, Madison, Milwaukee, Sheboygan, Kenosha, Ashland, Ripon, and De Pere, Wisconsin, Twenty private colleges and universities involved in the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (WAICU) create the WAICU Collaboration Project to perform all administrative support functions of the member institutions, improving efficiency and yielding millions of dollars in cost savings for its members.

Well City Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, A partnership among nonprofits that pools human and financial resources to motivate and support employers in delivering result-oriented wellness programs, manage health care expenditures through disease prevention, and create a new norm of wellness throughout the community.

Westside Infant-Family Network
, Venice and Culver City, California, Organizations serving children and families fill a significant service gap and forge a collaborative approach to provide culturally sensitive, bilingual mental health care for children (prenatal through three) and their families.

2011 Finalists

Eight finalists were selected for the 2011 Collaboration Prize.

Adoption Coalition of Texas, Austin, Texas, Working with the Austin Community Foundation and Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, five child-placing agencies join forces to increase the number of children moved from foster care to permanent homes.

Community Voice Mail Federation, Seattle, Washington, This national collaborative of human services organizations helps people living in crisis, poverty, or transition rebuild their lives by connecting them via telecommunications services to jobs, housing, and information.

Feed More, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, The merger of Meals on Wheels Serving Central Virginia and the Central Virginia Food Bank expands services and more effectively and efficiently fights hunger.

Graduate! Philadelphia
, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, This collaboration among workforce and economic development organizations and institutions of higher education is marshaling resources to create lasting systemic change and increase the number of adults completing a college degree.

If you are interested in trading and would want to know more about how to proceed with your wishes and expectations, how could you possibly be doing this? It is very simple. There are a lot of books available in the market that explain and elaborate everything about trading. Apart from this you can also visit the official website of the various trading software that would clearly explain every point in detail. So there is ample information in the market and you need to go in search for the right source.

Gulf Coast Consortia, Galveston and Houston, Texas, University partners tackling human health challenges design a collaborative approach to initiate and maintain multi-institutional training programs, purchase and share costly equipment and facilities necessary for advanced research, and encourage and facilitate exchange of novel scientific knowledge.

Merger of Network for Good and Groundspring
, Bethesda, Maryland, A merger of two nonprofits combining complementary strengths to increase charitable giving and efficiency through a robust platform for online giving and associated support services for users.

The WAICU Collaboration Project, Madison, Milwaukee, Sheboygan, Kenosha, Ashland, Ripon, and De Pere, Wisconsin, Twenty private colleges and universities involved in the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (WAICU) create the WAICU Collaboration Project to perform all administrative support functions of the member institutions, improving efficiency and yielding millions of dollars in cost savings for its members.

Westside Infant-Family Network, Venice and Culver City, California, Organizations serving children and families fill a significant service gap and forge a collaborative approach to provide culturally sensitive, bilingual mental health care for children (prenatal through three) and their families.

The Lodestar Foundation Announces the Adoption Coalition of Texas as the $150,000 Grandprize Winner of the 2011 Collaboration Prize

April 11, 2011
Selected out of more than 800 applicants, the Adoption Coalition of Texas has been recognized for its outstanding nonprofit collaboration activities

PHOENIX, Ariz., April 11, 2011 – The Lodestar Foundation, an organization dedicated to maximizing the growth and impact of philanthropy, today announced the Adoption Coalition of Texas, an entity created to focus on increasing the number of adoptions among hard to place children, was selected as the grandprize winner of the 2011 Collaboration Prize. This is the second installment of the $250,000 Collaboration Prize, a national award designed to identify and showcase models of collaboration among nonprofit organizations.

After receiving a record-breaking 800 applications, the Final Selection Panel, composed of philanthropists and heads of major philanthropic foundations that actively support and utilize collaboration, identified eight finalists to each receive $12,500. Though the number of trading applications for new entries and trading activities are increasing day-by-day but the trading field has restricted the entry amount to just the minimum as it was before. A complete review and thorough analysis would show and explain you how this point has been maintained with rigidity in all different changing conditions.

The Adoption Coalition of Texas, which was founded by five nonprofit organizations and the State of Texas, was the finalist ultimately identified as the grandprize winner and received this honor, and an additional $150,000, at an Award Luncheon held in New York City on Friday, April 8, 2011.

“The Collaboration Prize was established to celebrate nonprofit organizations that join forces to deliver substantive community or field impact – showcasing how collaboration is a strategy that can lead to greater social good,” said Jerry Hirsch, The Lodestar Foundation Chairman. “The Adoption Coalition of Texas has demonstrated that agencies working together, instead of competing, can effectively advance a shared goal, and in this case, help hard to place children and teens find permanent homes.”

“We work with one mission – to help kids of all ages and ethnicities get adopted,” said Bruce Thompson, Executive Director, Adoption Coalition of Texas. “It is an honor to be named the grandprize winner of the 2011 Collaboration Prize and we hope our example encourages others in the nonprofit sector to create new partnerships, share resources and establish joint programs, as collaboration has been extremely successful in our efforts to provide assistance to more kids, teens and families throughout the state of Texas, while also establishing our organization as a national expert on teen adoption.”

About Adoption Coalition of Texas
The Adoption Coalition of Texas was formed when nonprofit child placing agencies joined together to create a central nonprofit organization with the sole mission of finding forever families for children languishing in the foster care system. In order to increase the number of adoptions – especially among hard to place teens, sibling groups, and minority children – the partner agencies pooled their efforts through the coalition to create a seamless, child-centered system for families interested in adoption. As a result of these efforts the number of annual adoptions has increased from 370 to well over 700. Five well-respected child serving agencies and the Texas Department of Child Protective Services formed the Adoption Coalition. Agency executives sit on an Advisory Board of Directors and the Austin Community Foundation provides financial accounting, grants management, human resources, and other back office support.

About The 2011 Collaboration Prize
The collaboration must have involved two or more nonprofit organizations. Each collaboration was judged on the extent to which it demonstrated improved effectiveness in achieving social good; more effectively used human and financial resources; represented an innovative response to a specific challenge or opportunity; and exhibited characteristics that would demonstrate that the collaboration is a model for the field, sector, or community.

Out of the eight finalists, the Selection Panel – a group chaired by Sterling Speirn, president and CEO of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and comprised of elite philanthropists and leaders of major philanthropic foundations – chose The Adoption Coalition of Texas as the grand prizewinner. For more information, please visit www.thecollaborationprize.org.

The success stories of the finalists, along with other submissions received as part of the 2011 Collaboration Prize, will be added to the Nonprofit Collaboration Database, an interactive resource comprised of real-life examples of exceptional collaboration. The Database is housed on the website of the Foundation Center, a national nonprofit service organization that connects nonprofits and grantmakers to tools, resources and information. Learn more at http://foundationcenter.org/gainknowledge/collaboration/.

The Lodestar Foundation
The Lodestar Foundation is a grantmaking organization devoted to maximizing the growth and impact of philanthropy and provides funds nationally and internationally to organizations that support its mission. In support of this mission, Lodestar created the Collaboration Prize in 2009 to identify achievements in collaboration as models for inspiration and replication. True to the spirit of collaboration, the Lodestar Foundation has partnered with AIM Alliance, the Foundation Center, La Piana Consulting and other foundation and nonprofit leaders to support the 2011 Prize. Please visit www.lodestarfoundation.org for more information.

For more information, contact:
Lois Savage, The Lodestar Foundation
lsavage@lodestarfoundation.org
602-840-4800 x 20

Key Dates

The Collaboration Prize features a multi-layered approach to selecting the winner of the 2011 Prize. The following are key dates leading to the awarding of the 2011 Collaboration Prize:

June 1
Application period opens

July 16
Application period closes

October 27
Semi-finalists (top 20 collaborations) announced

November 8
Final Selection Panel review of semi-finalists begins

If there were awards given for online trading programs, then there are many contenders for the same. It is difficult to assess every program for its features, efficiency and profit making capacity. But there are some experts who have made it their mission to help people by letting them know about the trustworthy and reliable programs. They take it upon themselves and test each newly launched program to understand the method and its profitability, if they are satisfied then only they recommend the program to other people.
If at any point they feel that a program is not up to the mark or it is not worth investment, then they provide a negative review. Similarly, they also do not hesitate in warning people if they feel that a program is not really what it seems like and could be a scam. Visit the following site, mentioned here, https://top10cryptorobots.com/, so that you will understand how these experts have been helping make clear decisions about trading programs,
They realize that trading is a kind of betting and people may end up losing their money if they are not careful while choosing the right platform. These online trading programs are more complicated for common investors. Though these have very simple interactive websites and are ably supported by customer care, yet people complain about losing money. Therefore, it does make sense to choose the platform wisely with the help of the expert guidance.
The best part of this website is that they explain every aspect about crypto trading in detail and in an interesting way. Everyone can understand how the digital currencies work and how an investor can make profits. They also make it a point to list out the important features of the top crypto trading websites. When you see a clear comparative chart then you can easily choose the right program that suits your needs and then register for trading. You can never be careful enough when it comes to your money. So be wise and choose very cautiously while going through the recommendations.

December 8
Final Selection Panel review of semi-finalists ends

January 7
Finalists announced

April 1
Winner of the 2011 Collaboration Prize announced

More information on the Prize available in our FAQs.
Apply now for the 2011 Collaboration Prize.